{"id":741,"date":"2021-10-27T18:56:12","date_gmt":"2021-10-27T18:56:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/?p=741"},"modified":"2022-03-31T10:32:22","modified_gmt":"2022-03-31T10:32:22","slug":"book-review-playing-the-stonewall-dutch","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/book-review-playing-the-stonewall-dutch\/","title":{"rendered":"Book Review: Playing the Stonewall Dutch"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong>Book Review: <em>Playing the Stonewall Dutch<\/em><\/strong> by Nikola Sedlak (Quality Chess Publishing)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-media-text alignwide is-stacked-on-mobile\" style=\"grid-template-columns:25% auto\"><figure class=\"wp-block-media-text__media\"><a href=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/product\/playing-the-stonewall-dutch\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"724\" height=\"1000\" src=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/qcpsd-1591798758-1.jpeg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-745 size-full\" srcset=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/qcpsd-1591798758-1.jpeg 724w, https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/qcpsd-1591798758-1-217x300.jpeg 217w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 724px) 100vw, 724px\" \/><\/a><\/figure><div class=\"wp-block-media-text__content\">\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><a href=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/product\/playing-the-stonewall-dutch\">Playing the Stonewall Dutch<\/a><br><strong>Publisher:<\/strong> Quality Chess <br><strong>Author:<\/strong> GM Nikola Sedlak <br><strong>FC<\/strong> <strong>Release date:<\/strong> Jul 08, 2020<a href=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/sample\/playing-the-stonewall-dutch\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><\/a><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"alignleft size-full\"><a href=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/product\/playing-the-stonewall-dutch\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"227\" height=\"48\" src=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/button14.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-393\"\/><\/a><\/figure><\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p><em><strong>\u201cNot a Dutch surely? That would be fine by me! \u2026 So it is a Dutch Defence. One of the openings which, just like most masters, I am very happy to play on the white side.\u201d <\/strong>\u2013 <\/em>Tigran Petrosian (commenting on his game against Bent Larsen, San Antonio 1973 (1-0, 63).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The late, great former world champion was not a fan of the Dutch Defence, as the above quote shows.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In contrast, his opponent in this game, Bent Larsen, wrote in 1974:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>\u201c<em>Solid, rock-solid. Is this [the Stonewall Dutch] the answer to Black&#8217;s dreams if he has little time for opening theory? For some players, it may be, though it is a little discomforting that most experts think White has a small but clear positional advantage&#8230; Though some may call it primitive it is a fine solution to many of Black&#8217;s problems. But some difficulties remain. First of all, the Stonewall is not so good if White does not fianchetto his f1-bishop! It is very much against this bishop that Black&#8217;s strategy is directed. So if White is not a fianchetto man you are probably wise to have another system ready. (Not all Stonewall fans will agree.)\u201d<\/em><\/strong> &#8211;  Bent Larsen, 1974. <br><br><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"458\" height=\"726\" src=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/jfx1913692030353001328.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-748\" srcset=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/jfx1913692030353001328.png 458w, https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/jfx1913692030353001328-189x300.png 189w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 458px) 100vw, 458px\" \/><figcaption>GM Bent Larsen, the World Champions killer, scored victories over 7 World Champions between 1948 and 1985. Picture from his auto-biographical book <em><a href=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/product\/bent-larsen%27s-best-games\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Bent Larsen&#8217;s Best Games<\/a><\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>Nearly fifty years later, the author of this book, GM Nikola Sedlak, sides with Larsen and not Petrosian, and he provides a black repertoire on the Stonewall. He writes about the position after 1.d4 e6 2.c4 f5 3.g3 Nf6 4.Bg2 d5:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p class=\"rpbchessboard-spacerBefore\"><\/p>\n\n<div id=\"rpbchessboard-6adf5da7bae8c-1\" class=\"rpbchessboard-chessboard rpbchessboard-diagramAlignment-center\">\n    <noscript>\n        <div class=\"rpbchessboard-javascriptWarning\">\n            You must activate JavaScript to enhance chess diagram visualization.        <\/div>\n    <\/noscript>\n    <div class=\"rpbchessboard-chessboardAnchor\"><\/div>\n    <script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n        jQuery(document).ready(function($) {\n            var selector = '#' + \"rpbchessboard-6adf5da7bae8c-1\" + ' .rpbchessboard-chessboardAnchor';\n            RPBChessboard.renderFEN($(selector), {\"position\":\"rnbqkb1r\\\/ppp3pp\\\/4pn2\\\/3p1p2\\\/2PP4\\\/6P1\\\/PP2PPBP\\\/RNBQK1NR w KQkq - 0 5\",\"squareSize\":32,\"coordinateVisible\":true,\"turnVisible\":true,\"colorset\":\"original\",\"pieceset\":\"cburnett\"});\n        });\n    <\/script>\n<\/div>\n\n<p class=\"rpbchessboard-spacerAfter\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cFrom a purely aesthetic standpoint, Black&#8217;s position does not make the greatest first impression! Black seems to have gifted his opponent an outpost on e5, while also blocking the c8-bishop behind its own pawns. The justification for these concessions can be found in the space Black has gained, the solidity of his set-up (there&#8217;s a reason why the opening was named the Stonewall!), and his ability to develop actively with &#8230;Bd6 and &#8230;0-0, with various attacking and other dynamic possibilities available in the middlegame. Finally, setting up a rock-solid barrier to oppose the bishop on g2 is a great boon. In fact, I always like to wait for White to play g2-g3 before l commit to a Stonewall set-up. When White avoids doing so, I recommend choosing a different set-up, as detailed in Chapter 1.\u201d<br><br><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter size-full is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/540px-2019-Nikola-Sedlak.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-765\" width=\"346\" height=\"461\" srcset=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/540px-2019-Nikola-Sedlak.jpg 540w, https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/540px-2019-Nikola-Sedlak-225x300.jpg 225w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 346px) 100vw, 346px\" \/><figcaption>GM Nikola Sedlak, author of<a href=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/product\/playing-the-stonewall-dutch\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"> Playing the Stonewall Dutch<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>Sedlak is in complete agreement with Larsen!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Moreover, because of Sedlak\u2019s commitment to a Stonewall only against g2-g3, he prefers the move order 1.d4 e6 and only later \u2026f5. Of course, this allows White to enter a French Defence with 2.e4 d5. Some players may not have the French in their repertoire, and so Sedlak provides a chapter on 1.d4 f5. This move order allows a number of aggressive systems by White, including the Staunton Gambit (2.e4), 2.h3, 2.Bg5, and 2.Qd3. Some of the resulting positions are surprisingly sharp, and players will need to be well-prepared to meet them. Sedlak provides sensible options against all these systems.<br><br>Staunton Gambit with 2.e4 \n\n<p class=\"rpbchessboard-spacerBefore\"><\/p>\n\n<div id=\"rpbchessboard-6adf5da7bae8c-2\" class=\"rpbchessboard-chessboard rpbchessboard-diagramAlignment-center\">\n    <noscript>\n        <div class=\"rpbchessboard-javascriptWarning\">\n            You must activate JavaScript to enhance chess diagram visualization.        <\/div>\n    <\/noscript>\n    <div class=\"rpbchessboard-chessboardAnchor\"><\/div>\n    <script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n        jQuery(document).ready(function($) {\n            var selector = '#' + \"rpbchessboard-6adf5da7bae8c-2\" + ' .rpbchessboard-chessboardAnchor';\n            RPBChessboard.renderFEN($(selector), {\"position\":\"rnbqkbnr\\\/ppppp1pp\\\/8\\\/5p2\\\/3PP3\\\/8\\\/PPP2PPP\\\/RNBQKBNR b KQkq - 0 2\",\"squareSize\":32,\"coordinateVisible\":true,\"turnVisible\":true,\"colorset\":\"original\",\"pieceset\":\"cburnett\"});\n        });\n    <\/script>\n<\/div>\n\n<p class=\"rpbchessboard-spacerAfter\"><\/p>\n<br><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The first chapter deals with positions where White avoids the fianchetto after 1.d4 e6 2.c4 f5. In this case, Sedlak recommends various Nimzo-Indian and Queen\u2019s Indian type systems, rather than the Stonewall. &nbsp;The second chapter starts the Stonewall theory and looks at options after 1.d4 e6 2.c4 f5 3.g3 Nf6 4.Bg2 d5, where White plays Bf4 now or later, and 5.Nh3.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The backbone of the repertoire is the position after 1.d4 e6 2.c4 f5 3.g3 Nf6 4.Bg2 d5 5.Nf3 c6 6.O-O Bd6, where the modern 6\u2026Bd6 has replaced the older 6\u2026Be7. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\n\n<p class=\"rpbchessboard-spacerBefore\"><\/p>\n\n<div id=\"rpbchessboard-6adf5da7bae8c-3\" class=\"rpbchessboard-chessboard rpbchessboard-diagramAlignment-center\">\n    <noscript>\n        <div class=\"rpbchessboard-javascriptWarning\">\n            You must activate JavaScript to enhance chess diagram visualization.        <\/div>\n    <\/noscript>\n    <div class=\"rpbchessboard-chessboardAnchor\"><\/div>\n    <script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n        jQuery(document).ready(function($) {\n            var selector = '#' + \"rpbchessboard-6adf5da7bae8c-3\" + ' .rpbchessboard-chessboardAnchor';\n            RPBChessboard.renderFEN($(selector), {\"position\":\"rnbqk2r\\\/pp4pp\\\/2pbpn2\\\/3p1p2\\\/2PP4\\\/5NP1\\\/PP2PPBP\\\/RNBQ1RK1 w kq - 0 7\",\"squareSize\":32,\"coordinateVisible\":true,\"turnVisible\":true,\"colorset\":\"original\",\"pieceset\":\"cburnett\"});\n        });\n    <\/script>\n<\/div>\n\n<p class=\"rpbchessboard-spacerAfter\"><\/p>\n<br>The theory of this line is covered in three chapters, while the interesting 6\u2026 O-O (called the Flexible Stonewall by Sedlak) is covered in a separate chapter. Another interesting system is called the Aggressive Stonewall, which arises after 1.d4 e6 2.c4 f5 3.g3 Nf6 4.Bg2 d5 5.Nf3 Be7 6.O-O Ne4, is also covered in another chapter. <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n<p class=\"rpbchessboard-spacerBefore\"><\/p>\n\n<div id=\"rpbchessboard-6adf5da7bae8c-4\" class=\"rpbchessboard-chessboard rpbchessboard-diagramAlignment-center\">\n    <noscript>\n        <div class=\"rpbchessboard-javascriptWarning\">\n            You must activate JavaScript to enhance chess diagram visualization.        <\/div>\n    <\/noscript>\n    <div class=\"rpbchessboard-chessboardAnchor\"><\/div>\n    <script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n        jQuery(document).ready(function($) {\n            var selector = '#' + \"rpbchessboard-6adf5da7bae8c-4\" + ' .rpbchessboard-chessboardAnchor';\n            RPBChessboard.renderFEN($(selector), {\"position\":\"rnbqk2r\\\/ppp1b1pp\\\/4p3\\\/3p1p2\\\/2PPn3\\\/5NP1\\\/PP2PPBP\\\/RNBQ1RK1 w kq - 0 7\",\"squareSize\":32,\"coordinateVisible\":true,\"turnVisible\":true,\"colorset\":\"original\",\"pieceset\":\"cburnett\"});\n        });\n    <\/script>\n<\/div>\n\n<p class=\"rpbchessboard-spacerAfter\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p>Finally, Sedlak looks at move order issues and options against 1.c4 and 1.Nf3 to round off the theoretical discussion. The book ends with a series of exercises to test the reader\u2019s knowledge of the material.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It\u2019s clear from this overview that Sedlak has put a lot of thought into designing this repertoire, which is perhaps not surprising given that he plays the Dutch himself. There is a very good balance between analytical variations, computer recommendations, and verbal explanations. The theory is also complemented by a good range of annotated games. Although Sedlak obviously champions the black side of the Dutch, he is honest with his views on White\u2019s options. The book also contains a lot of new recommendations for the reader to try.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>An example from the book is given below, with annotations from the book.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p class=\"rpbchessboard-spacerBefore\"><\/p>\n\n<div id=\"rpbchessboard-6adf5da7bae8c-5\" class=\"rpbchessboard-chessgame\">\n    <noscript>\n        <div class=\"rpbchessboard-javascriptWarning\">\n            You must activate JavaScript to enhance chess game visualization.        <\/div>\n    <\/noscript>\n    <div class=\"rpbchessboard-chessgameAnchor\"><\/div>\n    <script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n        jQuery(document).ready(function($) {\n            var selector = '#' + \"rpbchessboard-6adf5da7bae8c-5\" + ' .rpbchessboard-chessgameAnchor';\n            RPBChessboard.renderPGN($(selector), {\"pgn\":\"[Event \\\"HUN-chT 1415\\\"]\\n[Site \\\"Hungary\\\"]\\n[Date \\\"2015.04.26\\\"]\\n[Round \\\"9.3\\\"]\\n[White \\\"Prohaszka\\\"]\\n[Black \\\"Sedlak\\\"]\\n[Result \\\"0-1\\\"]\\n[ECO \\\"A90\\\"]\\n[WhiteElo \\\"2588\\\"]\\n[BlackElo \\\"2559\\\"]\\n[PlyCount \\\"30\\\"]\\n[EventDate \\\"2014.10.12\\\"]\\n[EventType \\\"team-tourn\\\"]\\n[EventRounds \\\"9\\\"]\\n[EventCountry \\\"HUN\\\"]\\n[SourceTitle \\\"EXT 2016\\\"]\\n[Source \\\"ChessBase\\\"]\\n[SourceDate \\\"2015.10.08\\\"]\\n[SourceVersion \\\"1\\\"]\\n[SourceVersionDate \\\"2015.10.08\\\"]\\n[SourceQuality \\\"1\\\"]\\n[WhiteTeam \\\"Aquaprofit\\\"]\\n[BlackTeam \\\"Paks\\\"]\\n[WhiteTeamCountry \\\"HUN\\\"]\\n[BlackTeamCountry \\\"HUN\\\"]\\n\\n1. d4 e6 2. c4 f5 3. g3 Nf6 4. Bg2 c6 5. Nf3 d5 6. O-O Bd6 7. b3 Qe7 8. Bb2 O-O\\n9. Qc1 b5 10. Na3 $5 {This was a new move for me at the time. Despite being on\\nunfamiliar territory, I did not regard my opponent&#8217;s idea as being dangerous,\\nbecause I generally do not believe in such odd-looking moves. The only\\nadvantage of the text move is that the attack on the b5-pawn forces a reaction\\nfrom Black on the queenside. However, since I recommend &#8230;bxc4 followed by &#8230;\\nBa6 against White&#8217;s other main options as well it makes no difference to our\\nplan.} bxc4 11. bxc4 Ba6 12. Ne5 (12. c5 $6 Bc7 13. Qc2 Nbd7 14. Rfb1 f4 $40 {\\nwas excellent for Black in Anikaev &#8211; Moskalenko, Torredembarra 2010.}) (12. Nd2\\n$6 {looks too passive.} Nbd7 13. Nc2 {occurred in Hesham &#8211; Bhakti, Al Ain 2013,\\nwhen it would have been good to play:} f4 $1 $40 {with a lot of activity for\\nBlack.}) 12... Rc8 13. Nd3 Nbd7 14. c5 {White was more or less forced to block\\nthe position, otherwise &#8230;c5 would have caused him problems on the c-file.}\\nBc7 15. Qc2 {I considered this a critical moment in the game, as Black has a\\ncouple of decent ways of playing, each with distinct pros and cons.} Bxd3 $5 {\\nI mainly decided on this move due to being annoyed by the prospect of Nb4. My\\nother serious candidate move was} (15... Bb7 $5 {intending &#8230;a5 and ..Ba6. It\\nwas difficult to arrive at a decision, because I liked both options during the\\ngame, but ultimately the latter option felt a little slow for my taste. The\\nengine prefers 15&#8230;Bb7, but it is well known that engines tend to place a\\ncertain value on the bishop pair. Even now, I am not sure which move is better;\\nthe only clear conclusion is that Black is fine in both cases.}) 0-1\",\"pieceSymbols\":\"native\",\"navigationBoard\":\"scrollLeft\",\"withFlipButton\":true,\"withDownloadButton\":true,\"nboSquareSize\":32,\"nboCoordinateVisible\":true,\"nboTurnVisible\":true,\"nboColorset\":\"original\",\"nboPieceset\":\"cburnett\",\"nboAnimated\":true,\"nboMoveArrowVisible\":true,\"nboMoveArrowColor\":\"r\",\"idoSquareSize\":32,\"idoCoordinateVisible\":true,\"idoTurnVisible\":true,\"idoColorset\":\"original\",\"idoPieceset\":\"cburnett\"});\n        });\n    <\/script>\n<\/div>\n\n<p class=\"rpbchessboard-spacerAfter\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p>This example is a good illustration of the informative annotations used by Sedlak to explain the typical plans in the Stonewall. The author continues to annotate the rest of the game in the book, and he won in 51 moves.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In summary, Sedlak has written an excellent repertoire on the Stonewall Dutch. The combination of detailed explanations and analysis makes this a very good choice for both long-term Dutch players and those looking to take up the Dutch for the first time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-media-text alignwide is-stacked-on-mobile\" style=\"grid-template-columns:30% auto\"><figure class=\"wp-block-media-text__media\"><a href=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/product\/playing-the-stonewall-dutch\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"724\" height=\"1000\" src=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/qcpsd-1591798758-1.jpeg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-745 size-full\" srcset=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/qcpsd-1591798758-1.jpeg 724w, https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/qcpsd-1591798758-1-217x300.jpeg 217w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 724px) 100vw, 724px\" \/><\/a><\/figure><div class=\"wp-block-media-text__content\">\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><a href=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/product\/playing-the-stonewall-dutch\">Playing the Stonewall Dutch<\/a><br><strong>Publisher:<\/strong> Quality Chess <br><strong>Author:<\/strong> GM Nikola Sedlak <br><strong>FC<\/strong> <strong>Release date:<\/strong> Jul 08, 2020<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"alignleft size-full\"><a href=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/product\/playing-the-stonewall-dutch\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"227\" height=\"48\" src=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/button14.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-393\"\/><\/a><\/figure><\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Book Review: Playing the Stonewall Dutch by Nikola Sedlak (Quality Chess Publishing) \u201cNot a Dutch&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":764,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/741"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=741"}],"version-history":[{"count":16,"href":"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/741\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3495,"href":"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/741\/revisions\/3495"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/764"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=741"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=741"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=741"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}