{"id":4030,"date":"2024-09-09T21:08:26","date_gmt":"2024-09-09T21:08:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/?p=4030"},"modified":"2024-09-10T15:59:19","modified_gmt":"2024-09-10T15:59:19","slug":"book-review-a-guide-to-chess-improvement","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/book-review-a-guide-to-chess-improvement\/","title":{"rendered":"Book Review: A Guide To Chess Improvement"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong>Review: A Guide to Chess Improvement:<\/strong> <strong>The Best of Novice Nook<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>\u201cNo one gets good at chess quickly and without a lot of work; if that was possible I could not be a full-time chess instructor. There are no full-time tic-tac-toe instructors.\u201d \u2013 <\/em>The author.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p>NM Dan Heisman had a long-running column at <a href=\"https:\/\/chesscafe.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">ChessCafe<\/a>, and he eventually wrote more than 150 articles under the name of <em>Novice Nook<\/em>, a title suggested by the then publisher of the website, Hanon Russell. Regarding the name, Heisman writes:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cOf course, Hanon is a very strong player and most improving adults to him are relative novices. However, I quickly found that the ideas which help a player improve at one level can still be extremely helpful when elevated to another level. So Novice Nook ended up helping players of all levels get better.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This was illustrated by an email I received from a USCF expert (2000-2199), who wrote that he learned a lot from Novice Nook, but could not get his three lower-rated sons to read the column because they felt they were not novices!&#8230; So Novice Nook remained somewhat a misnomer.\u201d<br><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile\" style=\"grid-template-columns:24% auto\"><figure class=\"wp-block-media-text__media\"><a href=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/product\/a-guide-to-chess-improvement-the-best-of-novice-nook\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"724\" height=\"1000\" src=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/a-guide-to-chess-improvement-the-best-of-novice-nook-1684150606.jpeg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-4032 size-full\"\/><\/a><\/figure><div class=\"wp-block-media-text__content\">\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"> <br><a href=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/product\/a-guide-to-chess-improvement-the-best-of-novice-nook\">A Guide to Chess Improvement: The Best of Novice Nook<\/a><br><strong>Author:<\/strong> Dan Heisman<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><a href=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/sample\/a-guide-to-chess-improvement-the-best-of-novice-nook\">View Sample<\/a> | <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/product\/a-guide-to-chess-improvement-the-best-of-novice-nook\">BUY<\/a><\/strong><\/h3>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p><br>The book is an outgrowth of around half of these columns, where the material has rearranged and streamlined into what Heisman considers the most useful content. Heisman has de-emphasised material that is included in his other books, but the basic ideas from these books are still included. Some new material has also been added to the book.<\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1500\" height=\"1125\" src=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/DanH_High_Res.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-4034\" style=\"width:591px;height:auto\"\/><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n<p>Of particular importance is that the material from the columns has been arranged in logical sections for the book, rather than following the original chronological order of the columns. This is essential for the material in the book to flow appropriately and to improve the learning process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The book is split into nine sections as follows.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol>\n<li>General improvement.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Thought process.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Time management.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Skills and psychology.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Tactics and safety.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Openings.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Endgames and technique.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Strategy and positional play.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Shorter, lesson material.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p>Heisman notes that it is essential to have a focussed improvement plan and choosing relevant books to study, rather than reading a lot of books without any particular focus. He states:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cIf you have read 200 chess books and you are still not that good; then reading a random 201st is not likely the key to getting better!\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Heisman structures his suggested improvement plan on what he calls the \u201cBig five\u201d:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201c<strong>1. Safety<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Tactics; especially important are counting and basic motifs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>&nbsp;2. Piece activity<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Use all your pieces all the time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>&nbsp;3. Thinking process<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Real Chess, efficient analysis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>&nbsp;4. Time management<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Pace yourself to use almost all your time every game and allocating more time to critical moves.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>5. General guidelines\/principles<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Learning them, and how and when to apply them.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Heisman also offers a thinking process to help students to find the right moves in a game. In essence, the steps of what he calls a \u201csimplified thought process\u201d are based around five questions as follows.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;1.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; What are all the things my opponent\u2019s move does?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;2.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; What are all the positive things I want to do?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>3.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; What are all the moves that might accomplish one or more of my goals?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>4.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Which of those initial candidates can I reject immediately because they are not safe?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>5.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Of the final candidates, which one is best?&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Of the five questions, Heisman writes:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cInterestingly, strong players usually perform steps 1-4 very quickly and then spend the overwhelming majority of their time on step 5. In a sense, many \u201cimprovement\u201d chess books (except those on planning) are about performing step 5. However, most weak players omit one or more crucial steps, or else spend way too much time on them! Performing all the steps at least moderately well in a reasonable amount of time usually means you are on your way to becoming a good player.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Time management is another topic that gets extensive treatment, and here Heisman introduces the important concept of move triggers that determine when to make a move. The two triggers are:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201c<strong>Trigger 1:<\/strong> You have proven which move is best, so no further time is necessary; or<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Trigger 2:<\/strong> You have not proven which move is best, but time constraints (good time management) make it efficient for you to play the best move you have found so far.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Tactics are another area that Heisman treats in an original manner. In particular, he emphasises the concept of \u201cIs it safe?\u201d. &nbsp;This concept is defined as:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cA move is safe if the opponent has no forcing moves in reply that win material or checkmate.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Heisman states that it is essential to make sure that all your pieces are well-protected to avoid falling for a tactical strike.&nbsp; He provides many examples of this and includes a quiz for readers to test their understanding of this concept.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>He also discusses his five levels of piece safety from the most basic to the most complex:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201c<strong>1.&nbsp;<em>En Prise<\/em><\/strong><em>&nbsp;<\/em>\u2013 a piece is attacked but not guarded.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>2.&nbsp;<em>Counting<\/em><\/strong><em>&nbsp;<\/em>\u2013 can any sequence of exchanges win material?&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>3.&nbsp;<em>Tactical Motifs<\/em><\/strong><em>&nbsp;<\/em>\u2013 individual motifs for winning material or mating; e.g. pins, double attacks, removal of the guard, back-rank mates, skewers, promotion, etc.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>4.&nbsp;<em>Combinations<\/em><\/strong><em>&nbsp;<\/em>\u2013 combinations of tactical motifs; for example, a pin that sets up a double attack, or an interference move that allows a back-rank mate, etc.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>5.&nbsp;<em>Sacrificial Combinations<\/em><\/strong><em>&nbsp;<\/em>\u2013 combinations which include the sacrifice of material in order to force either win of material or checkmate.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Regarding the study of tactics in general, Heisman writes:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cThe most important goal of studying tactics is to be able to spot the elementary motifs very quickly, so studying the most basic tactics over and over until you can recognize them almost instantly is likely the single best thing you can do when you begin studying chess!\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As noted in the list of sections above, other important areas such as strategy, openings, chess vision and psychology are also discussed. In particular, he emphasises that chess study should be fun, rather than a chore.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Two examples from the book are given below, with annotations from the book.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>For the first example, the question is who is better and why?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The initial commentary is:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cAnalysis: Start by looking at checks, captures, and threats and, if there are none, look for a way to develop the pieces, for example by planning the thematic \u201cbreak\u201d move f2-f4. There are no checks and the two captures are 8.Nxe5 and 8.Bxh3.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p class=\"rpbchessboard-spacerBefore\"><\/p>\n\n<div id=\"rpbchessboard-6adf67ef5ac97-1\" class=\"rpbchessboard-chessgame\">\n    <noscript>\n        <div class=\"rpbchessboard-javascriptWarning\">\n            You must activate JavaScript to enhance chess game visualization.        <\/div>\n    <\/noscript>\n    <div class=\"rpbchessboard-chessgameAnchor\"><\/div>\n    <script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n        jQuery(document).ready(function($) {\n            var selector = '#' + \"rpbchessboard-6adf67ef5ac97-1\" + ' .rpbchessboard-chessgameAnchor';\n            RPBChessboard.renderPGN($(selector), {\"pgn\":\"[Event \\\"?\\\"]\\n[Site \\\"?\\\"]\\n[Round \\\"?\\\"]\\n[White \\\"Heisman\\\"]\\n[Black \\\"Example 1\\\"]\\n[Result \\\"*\\\"]\\n[PlyCount \\\"14\\\"]\\n\\n1. Nf3 d5 2. g3 Nc6 3. Bg2 e5 4. d3 Be6 5. O-O Qd7 6. e4 d4 7. Nbd2 Bh3 (7... Bh3 8. Bxh3 {looks questionable as the g2-square is weak, but it is always worth looking to see if, say,} (8. Nxe5 {does not look too promising, but you always have to check these things out, and not stop just because} Nxe5 {seems to win a piece because the position is not yet quiescent:} 9. Qh5 {double attacks, and the knight cannot guard the bishop nor the bishop the knight, so 9...Nxd3 or 9...Bxg2 looks forced. But} Nxd3 ({The main line} 9... Bxg2 {allows} 10. Qxe5+ {and then} Qe7 11. Qxe7+ Bxe7 12. Kxg2 {or other Black moves allow 11.Kxg2, so the surprising 8.Nxe5 is best, winning a pawn.}) 10. Bxh3 {attacks the queen (followed by c2xd3).}) 8... Qxh3 9. Ng5 {traps the queen. It does not, so there is nothing to recommend 8.Bxh3.}) *\\n\\n\",\"pieceSymbols\":\"native\",\"navigationBoard\":\"scrollLeft\",\"withFlipButton\":true,\"withDownloadButton\":true,\"nboSquareSize\":32,\"nboCoordinateVisible\":true,\"nboTurnVisible\":true,\"nboColorset\":\"original\",\"nboPieceset\":\"cburnett\",\"nboAnimated\":true,\"nboMoveArrowVisible\":true,\"nboMoveArrowColor\":\"r\",\"idoSquareSize\":32,\"idoCoordinateVisible\":true,\"idoTurnVisible\":true,\"idoColorset\":\"original\",\"idoPieceset\":\"cburnett\"});\n        });\n    <\/script>\n<\/div>\n\n<p class=\"rpbchessboard-spacerAfter\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The final commentary is:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cEvaluation: Count material: after the principal variation starting with 8.Nxe5 White sneaks away with a pawn and is left with a better position as well, including an imposing kingside pawn majority that will get rolling after a later f2-f4. The general rule is that an evaluation of +1 pawn is about the dividing line between a theoretical win and a draw. If the opponent has compensation for the pawn you are not likely winning yet, but if he has no compensation (or you have some!) then you are winning.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The second example is called \u201cLetting the One-Trick Pony Win.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p class=\"rpbchessboard-spacerBefore\"><\/p>\n\n<div id=\"rpbchessboard-6adf67ef5ac97-2\" class=\"rpbchessboard-chessgame\">\n    <noscript>\n        <div class=\"rpbchessboard-javascriptWarning\">\n            You must activate JavaScript to enhance chess game visualization.        <\/div>\n    <\/noscript>\n    <div class=\"rpbchessboard-chessgameAnchor\"><\/div>\n    <script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n        jQuery(document).ready(function($) {\n            var selector = '#' + \"rpbchessboard-6adf67ef5ac97-2\" + ' .rpbchessboard-chessgameAnchor';\n            RPBChessboard.renderPGN($(selector), {\"pgn\":\"[Event \\\"?\\\"]\\n[Site \\\"?\\\"]\\n[Round \\\"?\\\"]\\n[White \\\"Heisman\\\"]\\n[Black \\\"Example 2\\\"]\\n[Result \\\"0-1\\\"]\\n[FEN \\\"7r\\\/1B2p1k1\\\/RBR2pp1\\\/3r4\\\/p7\\\/P2P2P1\\\/4PP1p\\\/7K w - - 0 1\\\"]\\n[PlyCount \\\"25\\\"]\\n\\n{Black, a 1400 player, has lost two pieces as a result of the all-too-common but rarely discussed problem of miscounting on two capturing sequences (see the archived A Counting Primer). Therefore, Black\\u2019s only remaining game plan is a one-trick pony: if the rook on d5 can eventually check on the first rank, then ...h1=Q+ would follow with a win. But if Black cannot find a way to check on the first rank, then there is little to be done. So long as White follows the principles in When You\\u2019re Winning, It\\u2019s a Whole Different Game (7-3) and thinks defense first, he should come up with the obvious idea 1.Rc1! (or its cousin 1.Rc8!). Then White could figuratively laugh at Black as the one-trick pony is gone forever and his extra two bishops win easily. Sure, many other moves win, but that is not the point!  Unfortunately White did not have my advice in mind and instead played:} 1. Rxf6 $6 {This tricky discovered attack on the rook is completely unnecessary, flouting the second principle of When You\\u2019re Winning: Keep it Simple \\u2013 don\\u2019t play tricky. 1.Rxf6 is tricky. From a practical sense I could give this move two question marks since it causes all of White\\u2019s future problems but, theoretically, that would not be correct since White is still winning.} Rb5 {...was the immediate reply. So, with one tricky and unnecessary move, White goes from up two pieces and completely winning to figuring out how to save the game! Black admitted after the game that he would have resigned if White had just stopped any back-rank check.} 2. Rxg6+ $1 {Great move by White, who is also a 1400 player. It is a shame that such a great move is required just to keep winning, when a move ago almost any non-tricky move would have won. Now Black is faced with only bad choices.} Kxg6 $6 {Not the best. Black should try to stay off of the sixth rank by playing} (2... Kf7 {White would still be winning easily, but it would only be so after the difficult-to-find} 3. Bd5+ $1 {Would you have found this move for White if Black had played 2...Kf7 - ?}) 3. Be4+ $2 {Definitely not best. When you see a good move, look for a better one! Much better is} (3. Bd4+ $1 {, when White wins back the entire rook with interest:} Kh7 4. Be4+ {removes the guard and is much better than} (4. Bxh8 $2 {and is winning easily. 3.Be4+? is a direct check and 3.Bd4+ is a discovered check, but they are both checks \\u2013 make sure to consider all of them!})) 3... Kf7 {White has lost a rook from the original position! White is still winning, but The Margin for Error (7-4) has decreased dramatically.} 4. d4 {This was White\\u2019s idea from 3.Be4+, to guard the b1-square. It all would have been much easier if White had followed the think defense first idea and played 1.Rc1, preventing these problems forever. 5.Ba5, which wins. 5.Bc7 is also an option, allowing Bg6+ with the idea of trading rooks with Ra8+ after the black king is forced to the back rank.} Rb2 {Black continues to ride the one-trick pony, searching for places along the second rank that will allow the rook to get to the first rank safely.} 5. Bd3 $4 {This is Hope Chess. If White had looked to see that nothing could be done about the threat created by Black\\u2019s obvious reply, then this move would have been rejected as not playable. White should not be worried about the e-pawn, but instead focused on preventing Black\\u2019s infiltration points onto the first rank. After the game I suggested} Rd2 $1 {What did White expect? Black threatens the unstoppable 6...Rd1+. Now White began to think hard, but it is too late \\u2013 the hard thinking should have been done last move to prevent this from happening! You must plan to meet your opponent\\u2019s upcoming checks, captures, and threats before they make them, not after. 5...Rd2 is a good example of a threat that cannot be met, so it should never have been allowed. On the previous move White should have thought: \\u201cSuppose I play 5.Bd3, then what will Black do? Black wants to get on to the first rank, so the rook will move somewhere safe along the second rank to where the first rank is not guarded. Since 5...Ra2?? allows 6.Bc4+, suppose Black tries 5...Rd2 - ? Then there is no defense to 6...Rd1+, so I can\\u2019t play 5.Bd3...\\u201d} 6. Bg6+ {Too late, but worth a try. Maybe Black will blunder big time and capture!} Kg7 {Oh well. Good for Black. The rest needs no comment:} 7. Bc2 Rxc2 8. f4 Rc1+ 9. Kg2 h1=Q+ 10. Kf2 Qh2+ 11. Ke3 Qxg3+ 12. Kd2 Qxf4+ 13. e3 0-1\\n\\n\",\"pieceSymbols\":\"native\",\"navigationBoard\":\"scrollLeft\",\"withFlipButton\":true,\"withDownloadButton\":true,\"nboSquareSize\":32,\"nboCoordinateVisible\":true,\"nboTurnVisible\":true,\"nboColorset\":\"original\",\"nboPieceset\":\"cburnett\",\"nboAnimated\":true,\"nboMoveArrowVisible\":true,\"nboMoveArrowColor\":\"r\",\"idoSquareSize\":32,\"idoCoordinateVisible\":true,\"idoTurnVisible\":true,\"idoColorset\":\"original\",\"idoPieceset\":\"cburnett\"});\n        });\n    <\/script>\n<\/div>\n\n<p class=\"rpbchessboard-spacerAfter\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Of course, the book covers much more material than has been mentioned in this review, and it is of substantial size at just under 400 pages. All the concepts and suggestions are complemented by some good examples and very clear commentary. While there is some inevitable overlap across some sections, this does not distract the reader, but rather emphasises important concepts. In addition, the book includes a lot of material that has not been covered in other teaching texts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In conclusion, this is an excellent teaching text for a wide range of players. Heisman\u2019s many years as a chess instructor shows, and he has made the material accessible to chess students. The book provides many hours of chess instruction and is a very good guide to chess improvement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-media-text is-stacked-on-mobile\" style=\"grid-template-columns:24% auto\"><figure class=\"wp-block-media-text__media\"><a href=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/product\/a-guide-to-chess-improvement-the-best-of-novice-nook\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"724\" height=\"1000\" src=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/a-guide-to-chess-improvement-the-best-of-novice-nook-1684150606.jpeg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-4032 size-full\"\/><\/a><\/figure><div class=\"wp-block-media-text__content\">\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"> <br><a href=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/product\/a-guide-to-chess-improvement-the-best-of-novice-nook\">A Guide to Chess Improvement: The Best of Novice Nook<\/a><br><strong>Author:<\/strong> Dan Heisman<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><a href=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/sample\/a-guide-to-chess-improvement-the-best-of-novice-nook\">View Sample<\/a> | <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/product\/a-guide-to-chess-improvement-the-best-of-novice-nook\">BUY<\/a><\/strong><\/h3>\n<\/div><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Review: A Guide to Chess Improvement: The Best of Novice Nook \u201cNo one gets good&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":4033,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4030"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4030"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4030\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4040,"href":"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4030\/revisions\/4040"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4033"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4030"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4030"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4030"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}