{"id":2145,"date":"2023-03-24T13:44:43","date_gmt":"2023-03-24T13:44:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/?p=2145"},"modified":"2023-03-24T13:44:45","modified_gmt":"2023-03-24T13:44:45","slug":"celebrating-chess-champions-vasily-smyslov","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/celebrating-chess-champions-vasily-smyslov\/","title":{"rendered":"Celebrating Chess Champions: Vasily Smyslov"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center has-small-font-size\">By <strong>Andrey Terekhov<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Vasily Smyslov, the 7<sup>th<\/sup> World Chess Champion, was born on this day, 102 years ago. He played in four chess World Championships from 1948 to 1958 and became the 7th World Champion by defeating Mikhail Botvinnik in 1957. He would lose the title in the return match in 1958, but a quarter of the century later, he made a stunning comeback, making it all the way to the Candidates Final match. Only the unlimited energy of the young Garry Kasparov could stop Smyslov from qualifying for another world championship match at the ripe-old age of 63.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:21px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Interpolisschaaktoernooi_Tilburg_1819_Smyslov_aan_zet_Bestanddeelnr_929-3630-679x1024.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-2153\" width=\"354\" height=\"534\" srcset=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Interpolisschaaktoernooi_Tilburg_1819_Smyslov_aan_zet_Bestanddeelnr_929-3630-679x1024.jpg 679w, https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Interpolisschaaktoernooi_Tilburg_1819_Smyslov_aan_zet_Bestanddeelnr_929-3630-199x300.jpg 199w, https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Interpolisschaaktoernooi_Tilburg_1819_Smyslov_aan_zet_Bestanddeelnr_929-3630-768x1158.jpg 768w, https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Interpolisschaaktoernooi_Tilburg_1819_Smyslov_aan_zet_Bestanddeelnr_929-3630-1019x1536.jpg 1019w, https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Interpolisschaaktoernooi_Tilburg_1819_Smyslov_aan_zet_Bestanddeelnr_929-3630-1358x2048.jpg 1358w, https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Interpolisschaaktoernooi_Tilburg_1819_Smyslov_aan_zet_Bestanddeelnr_929-3630-1024x1544.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Interpolisschaaktoernooi_Tilburg_1819_Smyslov_aan_zet_Bestanddeelnr_929-3630-150x226.jpg 150w, https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Interpolisschaaktoernooi_Tilburg_1819_Smyslov_aan_zet_Bestanddeelnr_929-3630-scaled.jpg 1698w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 354px) 100vw, 354px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><sub><sup>Interpolis Chess Tournament Tilburg 1977. <\/sup><\/sub><br><sub><sup><em>(Photo: Suyk, Koen, ANEFO,&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nationaalarchief.nl\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Dutch National Archives<\/a><\/em><\/sup><\/sub><em>.<sub><sup>)<\/sup><\/sub><\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n<p>Yet, of all the world champions that the chess world has had to this date, Smyslov remains one of the least known. His style was not as flashy as Alekhine or Tal, and the more recent champions, such as Karpov or Carlsen, are better known today when it comes to strategic play.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I was first introduced to Smyslov&#8217;s games when I was a small kid. My coach at the time was big on chess fundamentals and thus I saw a lot of games by Capablanca, Botvinnik, Karpov \u2013 and yes, Smyslov. His play was magnificent and had that Mozart-like lightness about it, which is why Vladimir Kramnik once described Smyslov as &#8220;the truth in chess&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A few years after Smyslov passed away I bought a collection of his best games. It was Smyslov\u2019s \u201cmagnum opus\u201d, a book that contained 326 of his games played from 1935 and almost all the way to the end of his career as a player (well, not quite, as the book was published in 1995, while Smyslov continued to play until his eyesight failed, and that was already in the 21<sup>st<\/sup> century!) All games were annotated by Smyslov himself and replaying them felt like a reunion with a long-lost friend. I was once again in awe of the beauty of the games and the clarity of the annotations.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I started looking for other books on Smyslov&#8230; but could not find anything! There were literally no biographies of Smyslov \u2013 only the books that the 7<sup>th<\/sup> World Champion wrote himself. I kept on waiting, hoping that one day a renowned grandmaster or a famous chess historian would cover this gap in the chess literature, but then I realized that this day may never come, and so I decided to write it myself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Fast-forwarding a few years, I spent analyzing Smyslov\u2019s games, studying in the libraries, and reading old newspapers, chess journals, and tournament bulletins. Finally, I was able to get in touch with Smyslov\u2019s heirs and spent a week sorting out his personal archives in the house where the world champion spent the last years of his life.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>At the end of 2020, this work culminated in the publication of the first volume of what is hopefully going to be a long series on Smyslov, <strong>\u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/product\/the-life-and-games-of-vasily-smyslov,-volume-i?section=Search\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">The Life and Games of Vasily Smyslov. The Early Years: 1921-1948<\/a>\u201d<\/strong>, which is available on ForwardChess. This book describes Smyslov\u2019s ascent from an unknown and unranked chess amateur to the youngest participant in the World Championship match tournament that was organized in 1948 after the death of Alexander Alekhine.<\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/product\/the-life-and-games-of-vasily-smyslov,-volume-i?section=Search\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Books-36-2.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-2147\" width=\"336\" height=\"393\" srcset=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Books-36-2.png 456w, https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Books-36-2-256x300.png 256w, https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Books-36-2-150x176.png 150w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 336px) 100vw, 336px\" \/><\/a><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-buttons is-content-justification-center is-layout-flex wp-container-core-buttons-layout-1 wp-block-buttons-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-button\"><a class=\"wp-block-button__link has-background wp-element-button\" href=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/sample\/the-life-and-games-of-vasily-smyslov,-volume-i\" style=\"background:linear-gradient(135deg,rgb(254,205,165) 0%,rgb(254,45,45) 31%,rgb(107,0,62) 100%)\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">View Free Sample<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:28px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>The world that we live in today is vastly different from the one that Smyslov grew up in the late 1930s. Suffice it to say that Smyslov played his first tournament game only a few months after turning 14; today there are over dozen players who managed to achieve a grandmaster title by that age! (curiously enough, Smyslov even played a match against one of these prodigies, losing 1:5 to 13-years-old Etienne Bacrot in 1996)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>However, in his time Smyslov was a prodigy in his own right, and in this book, I am tracing his meteoric rise in the late 1930s-early 1940s. After a relatively late start to his \u201cofficial\u201d chess career, he progressed at a breakneck pace, winning almost every tournament that he played in (some of them with 100% scores!), becoming a junior champion of the Soviet Union in 1938, then scoring a newly introduced Candidate Master title by winning an all-Soviet adult competition of First Category players in August 1938, before finally scoring a Master title by winning the Moscow championship in October. At the age of 17, Smyslov became the youngest master in the Soviet Union (which should probably tell you how difficult that title was to achieve).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:23px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/02.01.-USSR-Junior-Championship-1938-1024x689.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-2149\" width=\"449\" height=\"301\" srcset=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/02.01.-USSR-Junior-Championship-1938-1024x689.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/02.01.-USSR-Junior-Championship-1938-300x202.jpg 300w, https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/02.01.-USSR-Junior-Championship-1938-768x517.jpg 768w, https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/02.01.-USSR-Junior-Championship-1938-1536x1034.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/02.01.-USSR-Junior-Championship-1938-2048x1379.jpg 2048w, https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/02.01.-USSR-Junior-Championship-1938-150x101.jpg 150w, https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/02.01.-USSR-Junior-Championship-1938-272x182.jpg 272w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 449px) 100vw, 449px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><sub><sup>Smyslov at the USSR Junior championship in January 1938<\/sup><\/sub><\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n<p>This string of successes was followed by a breakthrough performance in Smyslov\u2019s first Soviet Union championship in 1940, where he finished with a bronze medal \u2013 but ahead of Keres, Botvinnik, and Boleslavsky! (Bondarevsky and Lilienthal were the surprise winners)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In 1941, after another bronze in the Absolute championship of the Soviet Union (this time behind Botvinnik and Keres) Smyslov became the youngest grandmaster in the Soviet Union and, arguably, in the world.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Yes, there were times when a 20-year-old grandmaster was considered very young. For the next half a century teenage grandmasters would continue to be an exception, rather than a rule (the next youngest grandmaster would be Spassky, who became a GM at 18, then Fischer would famously push the record to 15\u00bd).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Let\u2019s take a look at a game that was typical for the energetic style of the young Smyslov:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<p class=\"rpbchessboard-spacerBefore\"><\/p>\n\n<div id=\"rpbchessboard-6adf5da6d8468-1\" class=\"rpbchessboard-chessgame\">\n    <noscript>\n        <div class=\"rpbchessboard-javascriptWarning\">\n            You must activate JavaScript to enhance chess game visualization.        <\/div>\n    <\/noscript>\n    <div class=\"rpbchessboard-chessgameAnchor\"><\/div>\n    <script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n        jQuery(document).ready(function($) {\n            var selector = '#' + \"rpbchessboard-6adf5da6d8468-1\" + ' .rpbchessboard-chessgameAnchor';\n            RPBChessboard.renderPGN($(selector), {\"pgn\":\"[Event \\\"Moscow \\\\\\\"Topedo\\\\\\\" championship\\\"]\\n[Site \\\"Moscow\\\"]\\n[Date \\\"1940.07.??\\\"]\\n[Round \\\"?\\\"]\\n[White \\\"Smyslov, Vassily\\\"]\\n[Black \\\"Kirillov\\\"]\\n[Result \\\"1-0\\\"]\\n[ECO \\\"C71\\\"]\\n[Annotator \\\"Terekhov\\\"]\\n[PlyCount \\\"45\\\"]\\n[EventDate \\\"1940.??.??\\\"]\\n[EventType \\\"game\\\"]\\n[EventCountry \\\"URS\\\"]\\n[SourceTitle \\\"EXT 2011\\\"]\\n[Source \\\"ChessBase\\\"]\\n[SourceDate \\\"2010.11.26\\\"]\\n[SourceVersion \\\"1\\\"]\\n[SourceVersionDate \\\"2010.11.26\\\"]\\n[SourceQuality \\\"1\\\"]\\n\\n{The game was played in a championship of a sports organization &#8220;Torpedo&#8221;, with which Smyslov was affiliated at the time and which united the workers of automobile, tractor and aviation industries. As mentioned in the historical essay, Smyslov&#8217;s connection to these industries was through his father, who was an economist at Moscow Automobile Factory named after Stalin and got him son to participate in the factory championshps.  It was one of the many team and regional championships that were typical for chess life in the Soviet Union. It took place in July 1940 and served as a kind of training for Smyslov before his most important tournament of the year, USSR championship. Smyslov finished the tournament with 10 points out of 11, but it was not enough for an outright victory, as another master and fellow participant of the upcoming USSR championship, Peter Dubinin, scored the same number of points!} 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 d6 5. d4 $5 {Smyslov goes for an obscure line that does not really promise an opening advantage White. However, it forces the opponent to think on his own from move 5, which is a good strategy against a less experienced opponent.} ({A more dangerous implementation of the same idea is to postpone by one move} 5. O-O Bd7 {and only now play} 6. d4 $5 {The resulting complications are more promising for White, as compared to the game, for example} b5 7. Bb3 Nxd4 8. Nxd4 exd4 9. c3 $1 dxc3 10. Qh5 Qe7 11. Nxc3 Nf6 12. Qf3 $44 {In fact, this version has even been played in modern correspondence chess games!}) 5... b5 {The most principled reaction} ({However, Black can also play} 5... Bd7 {as Steintitz did many times in XIX century, for example} 6. c3 Nf6 7. Nbd2 Be7 8. O-O O-O 9. Re1 Re8 10. Nf1 Bf8 11. Ng3 g6 12. h3 Bg7 13. Bc2 $14 {Lasker,Em-Steinitz, St Petersburg 1895}) 6. Bb3 Nxd4 ({More risky for Black is} 6... exd4 7. Bd5 Nge7 8. Nxd4 Bd7 9. O-O Nxd5 10. exd5 Nxd4 11. Qxd4 {with positional advantage for White (Smyslov)}) 7. Nxd4 exd4 8. c3 {Smyslov offers a risky gambit, hoping to outplay his opponent in tactical struggle} (8. Qxd4 $4 {is one of the most famous (and most commonly repeated!) blunders} c5 9. Qd5 Be6 10. Qc6+ Bd7 11. Qd5 c4 $19) (8. Bd5 {leads to equal position after} Rb8 9. Bc6+ Bd7 10. Bxd7+ Qxd7 11. Qxd4 $11) 8... dxc3 9. Qh5 {This a logical continuation of White&#8217;s previous play. In fact, with the best defense Black can now gain an upper hand, but the correct response was only found many years later} ({White could force a draw} 9. Qd5 Be6 $8 10. Qc6+ Bd7 11. Qd5 Be6 $8 $11 {but Smyslov of course wanted to win}) ({In 1940 Smyslov mentioned in the annotations that it was better to play} 9. Nxc3 {&#8220;with active piece play&#8221;. This has been in fact tried in a couple of games}) 9... Qe7 $6 ({A few years after this game Black found a strong improvement:} 9... Qd7 $1 10. Nxc3 Nf6 11. Qe2 Be7 12. O-O ({The stem game went} 12. Nd5 $2 Nxd5 13. exd5 O-O $17 {Stulik-Foltys, Zlin 1943}) 12... O-O {Black managed to get his king out of the center. White still has some compensation for the pawn, but Black is probably a bit better already}) 10. Nxc3 $44 {Now White has a full compensation for the pawn, since it is not easy for Black to complete development} Nf6 11. Qe2 Be6 $6 ({It was more prudent to protect d5 by} 11... c6) 12. O-O c6 ({If} 12... g6 {then} 13. Qf3 {threatening e4-e5} ({In the manuscript annotations Smyslov first wrote} 13. Bg5 Bg7 14. Nd5 Bxd5 15. Bxd5 Rb8 16. Bc6+ Kf8 17. a4 {&#8220;with initiative&#8221;, but then struck this variation out in favor of 13.Qf3}) 13... Rb8 14. Bg5 Bg7 15. e5 dxe5 16. Ne4 Bf5 17. Nxf6+ Bxf6 18. Qc6+ Bd7 19. Qxf6 $18) 13. Bg5 Bxb3 $6 {This exchange pours more fuel onto the fire by opening an additional line for White} ({Black could still get away more or less unscathed by playing} 13... h6 14. Bxf6 Qxf6 15. Nd5 Qd8 $8 16. a4 Be7 17. Nxe7 Qxe7 18. Bxe6 Qxe6 19. axb5 cxb5 20. Rxa6 $1 O-O $1 21. Qxb5 Rxa6 22. Qxa6 Rb8 $1 {and Black will regain the pawn with an equal position. However, Black probably did not see what was wrong with what he played}) 14. axb3 Qe6 $2 {In a style that was common for chess annotations of that era, Smyslov does not suggest any improvements for Black, as if to suggest that White win was more or less inevitable} (14... h6 $1 {still worked for Black} 15. Bxf6 (15. Bh4 $2 g5 $1) 15... Qxf6 16. Qc2 Qd8 $1 {and it seems that Black can still somehow hold this together}) 15. Qc2 $1 $16 {Creating a deadly threat that went unnoticed by Black} Nd7 $2 {Diagram \\ue005 Decisive mistake, although the position was already very difficult} ({White&#8217;s main threat was} 15... Be7 16. Nxb5 $1 cxb5 $2 17. Qc6+) ({Computer suggests horrible-looking} 15... Qd7 $5 {as best defense} 16. Bxf6 gxf6 17. Ne2 Bg7 18. Nd4 O-O $16 {Black pawn structure is a mess and bishop g7 is a glorified pawn, but at least he managed to castle!}) 16. Rxa6 $3 {Beautiful shot!} Rc8 ({The point of White&#8217;s combination is} 16... Rxa6 17. Nxb5 $18 {and Black cannot prevent a fork on c7 without returning the rook. The worst part is that after} Ra7 {White does not even have to take the rook immediately, as after} 18. Qxc6 $1 f6 19. Be3 $18 {rook still cannot escape}) 17. Rfa1 h6 $6 {Kirillov was clearly demoralized by the previous moves and thus goes down without the fight} ({More stubborn was} 17... Be7 18. Bxe7 (18. Ra8 $2 O-O {and Black fights on}) 18... Kxe7 $5 (18... Qxe7 $2 19. Rxc6 $1 $18) 19. Ne2 Rhe8 20. Nd4 Qf6 $18 {Black is still losing, but he still has hopes of escaping into an endgame one or two pawns down}) 18. Rxc6 $6 ({Interestingly enough, computer has a strong preference for} 18. Ra8 Nb8 19. R1a7 $3 hxg5 20. Nd5 {and Black is helpless against the threat of Rxb8, for example} Kd8 (20... cxd5 21. Rxb8 $1 {with inevitable mate}) 21. Rxb8 Rxb8 22. Qxc6 Qc8 23. Rc7 Be7 {and now the quiet} 24. h3 $1 $18 {emphasizes the awful position of all Black pieces}) 18... Rxc6 $2 {Allowing a beautiful finish} ({More stubborn was} 18... Ne5 $1 19. Rxc8+ Qxc8 20. Bf4 Be7 21. Qe2 O-O 22. Qxb5 Qb8 $18 {As in a few previous variations, Black is two pawns down, but at least he is not mated anytime soon!}) 19. Ra8+ Nb8 20. Rxb8+ Rc8 ({Smyslov also gives variation} 20... Kd7 21. Rd8+ Kc7 22. Nxb5+ Kb7 23. Qxc6+ Kxc6 24. Nd4+ Kc7 25. Nxe6+ fxe6 26. Be7 $1 $18) 21. Nd5 Rxb8 22. Qc6+ Qd7 23. Nc7# {The game reminds of the best attacks by Paul Morphy!} 1-0\",\"pieceSymbols\":\"native\",\"navigationBoard\":\"scrollLeft\",\"withFlipButton\":true,\"withDownloadButton\":true,\"nboSquareSize\":32,\"nboCoordinateVisible\":true,\"nboTurnVisible\":true,\"nboColorset\":\"original\",\"nboPieceset\":\"cburnett\",\"nboAnimated\":true,\"nboMoveArrowVisible\":true,\"nboMoveArrowColor\":\"r\",\"idoSquareSize\":32,\"idoCoordinateVisible\":true,\"idoTurnVisible\":true,\"idoColorset\":\"original\",\"idoPieceset\":\"cburnett\"});\n        });\n    <\/script>\n<\/div>\n\n<p class=\"rpbchessboard-spacerAfter\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:22px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>By 1940-41 Smyslov became one of the strongest chess players in the world. According to Chessmetrics, Smyslov broke into the Top 10 by October 1940 and would remain there for 30 years straight, until 1970!&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>However, in the 1940s Smyslov still struggled in head-to-head encounters with the best of the best. Smyslov\u2019s score at the time against Botvinnik, Keres, and Reshevsky was negative \u2013 although it should be pointed out that all of these challengers for the throne were 5-10 years older than Smyslov and thus much more experienced. In the 1930s all of them had the opportunities to cross swords with the likes of Lasker and Capablanca \u2013 the demi-gods that Smyslov saw only as a spectator at the 1935-36 Moscow International Tournaments, but never got to face at the board.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It took 10-15 years before Smyslov managed to overtake Keres and Reshevsky. In the end, he did it in the most convincing fashion &#8211; by winning two Candidates&#8217; tournaments in a row.\u00a0It took longer still \u2013 two decades and two more World Championship matches! \u2013 before Smyslov finally managed to defeat Botvinnik.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>However, it was in the 1940s that Smyslov managed to score his first victories against his chief competitors.&nbsp;One of the last games that I analyze in detail in my book is Smyslov\u2019s victory over Reshevsky in the 1948 World Championship match tournament. It is one of the best-known games by Smyslov and provides a great illustration of the refined and logical style that he developed and that would become his trademark until the last days of his long and illustrious career.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:20px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/10.03.-1948-Match-tournament-participants-1024x573.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-2151\" width=\"724\" height=\"405\" srcset=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/10.03.-1948-Match-tournament-participants-1024x573.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/10.03.-1948-Match-tournament-participants-300x168.jpg 300w, https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/10.03.-1948-Match-tournament-participants-768x429.jpg 768w, https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/10.03.-1948-Match-tournament-participants-1536x859.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/10.03.-1948-Match-tournament-participants-2048x1145.jpg 2048w, https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/10.03.-1948-Match-tournament-participants-150x84.jpg 150w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 724px) 100vw, 724px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><sub><sup>Participants of the 1948 World championship match tournament (from left to right: Keres, Smyslov, Reshesvky, Euwe, Botvinnik).<\/sup><\/sub><\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n<p>Here it is with abridged notes (in the book I dive deeper into the theoretical debate that raged at the match tournament, and compare the annotations of this game by Smyslov, Keres, Kasparov, and other famous commentators):<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:22px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n\n<p class=\"rpbchessboard-spacerBefore\"><\/p>\n\n<div id=\"rpbchessboard-6adf5da6d8468-2\" class=\"rpbchessboard-chessgame\">\n    <noscript>\n        <div class=\"rpbchessboard-javascriptWarning\">\n            You must activate JavaScript to enhance chess game visualization.        <\/div>\n    <\/noscript>\n    <div class=\"rpbchessboard-chessgameAnchor\"><\/div>\n    <script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n        jQuery(document).ready(function($) {\n            var selector = '#' + \"rpbchessboard-6adf5da6d8468-2\" + ' .rpbchessboard-chessgameAnchor';\n            RPBChessboard.renderPGN($(selector), {\"pgn\":\"[Event \\\"World-ch17\\\"]\\n[Site \\\"The Hague\\\/Moscow\\\"]\\n[Date \\\"1948.04.11\\\"]\\n[Round \\\"11\\\"]\\n[White \\\"Smyslov, Vassily\\\"]\\n[Black \\\"Reshevsky, Samuel Herman\\\"]\\n[Result \\\"1-0\\\"]\\n[ECO \\\"C75\\\"]\\n[Annotator \\\"Terekhov\\\"]\\n[PlyCount \\\"103\\\"]\\n[EventDate \\\"1948.03.02\\\"]\\n[EventType \\\"tourn\\\"]\\n[EventRounds \\\"25\\\"]\\n[EventCountry \\\"URS\\\"]\\n[SourceTitle \\\"MainBase\\\"]\\n[Source \\\"ChessBase\\\"]\\n[SourceDate \\\"1999.07.01\\\"]\\n[SourceVersion \\\"2\\\"]\\n[SourceVersionDate \\\"1999.07.01\\\"]\\n[SourceQuality \\\"1\\\"]\\n\\n1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 d6 {&#8220;Modern Steinitz&#8221; defence, which is characterized by the inlcusion of 3&#8230;a6 before 4&#8230;d6, was one of the most debated lines in the whole World Championship match tournament, featuring in five different games.} 5. c3 Nge7 $6 {This rare line was surprisingly popular in 1940s, as it was employed by Keres and Reshevsky. Bondarevsky also played it regularly and continued to defend it well into 1950s. The line was not new for Smyslov, as he faced it as White in two earlier games. What&#8217;s more, he had a benefit of watching the battles that took place in the previous rounds of 1948 Match Tournament.} ({Later in his career Smyslov also played &#8220;modern Steinitz&#8221; with Black, but following a more traditional setup with} 5... Bd7 6. d4 Nf6) 6. d4 Bd7 7. Bb3 {The bishop is no longer useful on a4 and thus is transferred to a better diagonal} h6 {Necessary to prevent Ng5} 8. Nbd2 Ng6 9. Nc4 Be7 10. O-O O-O ({Later practice focused on} 10... Bg5 $5 11. Ne3 Bxe3 12. Bxe3 O-O ({or} 12... Qf6 {In both cases White retains a small plus, but in practice it is difficult to convert it into something tangible})) 11. Ne3 Bf6 12. Nd5 {[#]} Re8 $2 {So far the opponents followed Euwe-Keres game, played in the first round of Match Tournament, but now Reshevsky deviates. Smyslov: &#8220;In choosing the move in the game, Reshevsky thought that he was improving the entire variation, but with his simple reply White gains a positional advantage.&#8221;} ({Keres played} 12... exd4 13. Nxd4 Re8 14. Nxf6+ $6 ({Stronger was} 14. Bc2 {Keres suggested that Black can attack the center with} Nxd4 15. cxd4 Bb5 16. Re1 c5 {but after} 17. Nxf6+ Qxf6 18. Be3 $14 {White pieces are better coordinated}) 14... Qxf6 15. f3 $11 {Euwe,-Keres, The Hague\\\/Moscow 1948}) 13. dxe5 $1 Bxe5 {Reshevsky gives up the bishop pair, but keeps the center locked by taking with a pawn next move. Whether it was better to keep e-file open has been debated for the next 60 years!} ({The point of the pawn exchange is that Black cannot play} 13... dxe5 $2 {because of} 14. Nxf6+ {and both captures lose material}) (13... Ngxe5 14. Nxe5 Nxe5 {is the other critical line that has been analyzed by many great players. Next moves are more or less obvious:} 15. f4 Nc6 {but then White has to play} 16. Bc2 $1 {instead of 16.e5 or 16.Qd3 that were debated by the annotators for more than half a century!}) 14. Nxe5 dxe5 15. Qf3 $16 {Black&#8217;s position is worse than it looks at first glance. White has strong bishops, pressure on d-file and a dominating knight on d5. At the same time, Black will find it difficult to even connect his rooks, while both the queen and Ng6 do not have any prospects for the moment} Be6 16. Rd1 Bxd5 $6 {This exchange is premature} ({Better was} 16... Qc8 17. h3 Rd8 {and Black could still hope to improve his position with Rd7, Qd8 etc.}) 17. Rxd5 $1 {[#] The strongest capture and one that fitted Smyslov&#8217;s style best. White maintains a clear positional advantage with no risk} Qe7 18. Qf5 {White pieces arrive to the best squares with impressive efficiency. Each following move increases the pressure slightly, until the opponent&#8217;s position simply falls apart.} Nf8 (18... Rad8 $2 {loses a pawn after} 19. Bxh6 $1 gxh6 20. Rxd8 Rxd8 21. Qxg6+) 19. Be3 {Threatening Bc5} Ne6 20. Rad1 Red8 21. g3 {Smyslov: &#8220;Exploiting the fact that the Black pieces are tied down, White strengthens his position and restricts the mobility of the enemy knights&#8221;} Rd6 {Trying to plug d-file, but it does not help} 22. Rxd6 $5 {&#8220;Chess is the art of exchange&#8221; &#8211; this move closes d-file, but creates a backward pawn in Black camp, which Smyslov immediately sets to attack} cxd6 23. Qg4 $1 Kh8 24. Bb6 {Controlling d8 and threatening to increase pressure on d6 with Rd2-Qd1 or Qf3-d3} Nb8 $2 {Trying to force out bishop from b6 by playing Nd7. However, this locks out Ra8, which proves to be decisive} ({In his annotations for &#8220;Shakhmaty v SSSR&#8221; Lilienthal suggested} 24... Rc8 {to defend the pawn with a rook from c6, but Keres gave a convincing refutation in his Match Tournament book:} 25. Rd2 Nb8 26. Qd1 Rc6 27. Ba7 Nd7 28. Bd5 {and the pawn falls anyway}) ({Keres also pointed} 24... Nc7 {as the most stubborn defense. Smyslov showed that this was not very promising either:} 25. Qf3 Rf8 26. Qd3 Ne8 ({Perhaps} 26... Na8 $5 27. Be3 Rd8 $16 {is the best chance, but there is no doubt that with a knight on a8 Black won&#8217;t be able to hold for much longer}) 27. Ba4 $1 {and White wins either d6 or a6 pawn}) 25. Bxe6 fxe6 {[#]} 26. Qh4 $1 {Very beautiful. It is difficult for humans to even consider such a counterintuitive move, and one also has to notice the unusual follow-up idea that we will see next} ({It should be noted that a simple} 26. Qf3 {(pointed out by Dvoretsky) was winning as well:} Nd7 27. Bc7 d5 28. exd5 $18) 26... Qd7 (26... Qxh4 27. gxh4 Nd7 28. Rxd6 Nf8 (28... Nxb6 29. Rxb6 {loses another pawn}) 29. h5 $1 {Black is a pawn down, as well as completely tied up}) 27. Qd8+ {Smyslov: &#8220;A rare instance of the harmonious coordination by White&#8217;s pieces in the opponent&#8217;s camp, which logically results from his systematic strategy. It is here that the weakness of the back rank tells!&#8221;} Qxd8 28. Bxd8 Nd7 29. Bc7 Nc5 30. Rxd6 Rc8 $1 {By 30th move Black finally managed to develop all of his pieces and he is only a pawn down, so White still has work to do. Reshevsky never seriously studied the openings theory, so he had a lot of practice in defending worse positions quite often, similar to Smyslov at the time!} 31. Bb6 Na4 32. Rxe6 Nxb2 33. Rxe5 Nc4 (33... Rxc3 $2 34. Bd4 Rc2 35. Re8+ Kh7 36. Re7 $18 {is completely hopeless}) 34. Re6 Nxb6 ({The last practical chance was} 34... Kg8 $5 {when White has to support the rook with} 35. f4 $8 ({Everything else loses material, for example} 35. Bd4 $4 Kf7 $19) {After that Black could even restore material equality after} 35... Nxb6 36. Rxb6 Rxc3 37. Rxb7 Rc1+ 38. Kg2 Rc2+ 39. Kf3 $1 Rxh2 40. e5 $5 Rxa2 {but his position would still be completely lost due to overwhelming activity of White pieces and pawns:} 41. e6 Kf8 42. Rf7+ Kg8 43. f5 $18) 35. Rxb6 Rxc3 36. Rxb7 $18 {[#]} Rc2 37. h4 $5 {Smyslov is not trying defend his a2 pawn and does not even mind Black rook staying on 2nd rank. Instead he is planning to box Black king in on the last rank before starting to advance his king and passed pawns. It could be said that Smyslov wanted to win this endgame &#8220;with maximum comfort&#8221;} Rxa2 38. Kg2 {Making sure that the king would never get cut out on the last rank} a5 $6 39. h5 $1 {Now Black is completely tied down} a4 40. Ra7 {A small inaccuracy on the last move in time trouble} ({Keres pointed out that} 40. Rb8+ Kh7 41. Ra8 {was simpler, as the king would never be able to get out:} g5 42. Ra7+ Kg8 43. Kf3 {and the pawn h6 cannot be protected}) 40... Kg8 {Black king got out of the corner, but it is still cut out on the last rank and cannot leave g7 unprotected. Black rook is tied down by his own a-pawn. That means that White can push his pawns and king up the board at his leisure.} 41. g4 {Horowitz and Kmoch share an interesting anecdote about the conclusion of this game in &#8220;Chess Review&#8221;, #6\\\/1948: &#8220;The game was adjourned and when it was played off, Reshevsky was astonished to see the hall filled to capacity. He asked Alexander Kotov why so many people had come to see a performance that could be only short and painful. Kotov replied that U.S. champion was famous for his remarkable recoveries in critical situations. Sammy sighed. &#8220;This time it&#8217;s too late for tactical jokes,&#8221; he said.&#8221;} a3 42. Kg3 Re2 43. Kf3 $1 {The e-pawn is of course more valuable than Black&#8217;s a-pawn} Ra2 44. Ke3 Kf8 45. f3 Ra1 46. Kf4 a2 {This is more or less forced} ({If Black stays put, White wins with} 46... Kg8 47. Kf5 Rf1 48. Rxa3 {and f3 pawn is protected}) 47. e5 Kg8 48. Kf5 Rf1 49. Rxa2 Rxf3+ 50. Kg6 Kf8 (50... Rf8 51. Ra7 $18) 51. Ra8+ Ke7 52. Ra7+ {This was Smyslov&#8217;s first and only victory over Reshevsky in the Match Tournament. The other games between them ended in hard fought draws, so Smyslov won their mini-match +1=4. Reshevsky was a tremendous defender, so it took one of the best efforts in Smyslov&#8217;s career to defeat him. White&#8217;s play is deceptively simple, strong and elegant &#8211; quintessential Smyslov!} (52. Ra7+ Ke6 53. Rxg7 Kxe5 54. Kxh6 $18) 1-0\",\"pieceSymbols\":\"native\",\"navigationBoard\":\"scrollLeft\",\"withFlipButton\":true,\"withDownloadButton\":true,\"nboSquareSize\":32,\"nboCoordinateVisible\":true,\"nboTurnVisible\":true,\"nboColorset\":\"original\",\"nboPieceset\":\"cburnett\",\"nboAnimated\":true,\"nboMoveArrowVisible\":true,\"nboMoveArrowColor\":\"r\",\"idoSquareSize\":32,\"idoCoordinateVisible\":true,\"idoTurnVisible\":true,\"idoColorset\":\"original\",\"idoPieceset\":\"cburnett\"});\n        });\n    <\/script>\n<\/div>\n\n<p class=\"rpbchessboard-spacerAfter\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:28px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>If you would like to learn more about Smyslov\u2019s incredible rise to the top, you can check \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/sample\/the-life-and-games-of-vasily-smyslov,-volume-i\">The Life and Games of Vasily Smyslov. The Early Years: 1921-1948<\/a>\u201d on ForwardChess. The book contains 48 deeply annotated games, as well as his detailed biography, including previously unpublished photos and letters from Smyslov\u2019s personal archive.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:24px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-buttons is-layout-flex wp-block-buttons-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-button aligncenter\"><a class=\"wp-block-button__link has-background wp-element-button\" href=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/product\/the-life-and-games-of-vasily-smyslov,-volume-i\" style=\"background:linear-gradient(135deg,rgb(254,205,165) 0%,rgb(254,45,45) 31%,rgb(107,0,62) 100%)\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">View Book<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Andrey Terekhov<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-media-text alignwide is-stacked-on-mobile\" style=\"grid-template-columns:26% auto\"><figure class=\"wp-block-media-text__media\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"661\" height=\"699\" src=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Terekhov-Chess.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-2159 size-full\" srcset=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Terekhov-Chess.jpg 661w, https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Terekhov-Chess-284x300.jpg 284w, https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/Terekhov-Chess-150x159.jpg 150w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 661px) 100vw, 661px\" \/><\/figure><div class=\"wp-block-media-text__content\">\n<p class=\"has-small-font-size\"><strong>Andrey Terekhov <\/strong>is a FIDE Master and an ICCF International Master (correspondence chess). He is the author of &#8220;<a href=\"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/product\/the-life-and-games-of-vasily-smyslov,-volume-i?section=Search\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">The Life and Games of Vasily Smyslov. Volume 1: The Early Years. 1921-1948<\/a>&#8221; and currently resides in France.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By Andrey Terekhov Vasily Smyslov, the 7th World Chess Champion, was born on this day,&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":12,"featured_media":2156,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,54],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2145"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/12"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2145"}],"version-history":[{"count":14,"href":"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2145\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2165,"href":"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2145\/revisions\/2165"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2156"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2145"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2145"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forwardchess.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2145"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}